SEX OFFENDERS WITH NO VICTIM CONTACT SERVE MORE JAIL THAN CHILD MOLESTERS IN TAMPA BAY FLORIDA

A new report from Sexual Abuse A Journal of Research and Treatment examines the rates of recidivism for sex offenders over a thirty year period for sexual offenses where there was actual contact as well as for sexual offenses in which the Defendant was convicted of a sex offense in which there was no contact with a victim, such as child pornography, voyeurism or exhibitionism. At least one Clearwater Criminal Defense Lawyer believes the destructive nature of the harsh punishments imposed in Florida criminal courts for non-contact sex offender cases is often too severe especially when compared to cases with minimal punishment where there is actual contact. The findings and conclusions of the study support lower sentences for non-contact offenders and for those offenders who are over the age of 45.  

The study notes that the following: Risk for contact sexual offending was related to antisocial behavior  and sexual deviance as indicated by having unrelated victims. Noncontact sexual offending was related to sexual deviance in the absence of antisocial behavior … we found evidence that noncontact sexual offending does not lead to contact sexual offense. Only 4% of noncontact offenders in this sample were found to go on to commit a contact sexual reoffense during the follow-up period. 

It is quite likely that those showing none of the indications of sexual deviance or antisocial behavior are in need of fewer treatment and supervisory services than those with indications of sexual deviance and/or antisocial behavior. Furthermore, our data indicate that life-time probation and registration requirements are unlikely to improve community safety. We found that after the age of 45, the risk for sexual reoffending drops precipitously. In addition, our data indicate that after 20 years in the community offense free, the risk of reoffending is extremely low.

Federal Courts in Tampa Bay punish child pornography with more jail time than actual child molestation
William Hogarth, Self Portrait, 1757
Clearly, even a  Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer  understands that a Defendant who had actual physical contact with a victim should be punished harshly, but for someone who had no physical contact with a victim shouldn’t there be less prison, less supervision and less over all punishment? Yet in Federal court in the Middle District of Florida in Tampa it’s not unusual for Defendants to serve significant jail sentences for crimes involving no contact with a victim. Is it reasonable that punishment for possession of child pornography could ever be greater than punishment for actually molesting a child? In one reason case of child pornography the Defendant received 17 years for possession of child pornography and the FBI and Federal Prosecutors in the Middle District of Florida, which encompasses Orlando as well as Tampa Bay and Pinellas, Florida, were proud enough of the sentence to put it on their web page.

Soon the Federal Guideline Commission will be tackling the problem of fair sentencing as it relates to sex crimes and the hope is that this new report on non-contact sexual offenses will sway the Commission to bring the guidelines to a reasonable level while also giving Federal District Judges much more discretion to go under the guidelines for non-contact sexual offenses.

WILL CONGRESS CHANGE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES? TAMPA & PINELLAS FEDERAL DEFENDANTS CAN ONLY HOPE SENTENCING WILL SOON BE FAIRER

The United States Sentencing Commission just finished an extensive study on the effects of Mandatory Minimum sentences in federal sentencing which it has just sent to the U.S. Congress. 
You’ll find some excellent recommendations that Congress should immediately adopt such as reducing Mandatory Minimum sentences, giving Judges more discretion in sentencing, reducing Prosecutorial power, enlarging the safety valve for more than just first time offenders, making the guidelines fairer and reducing demographic and racial disparity in sentencing – all of which would provide your Federal Criminal Trial Attorney with some reason to believe that sentencing under the Federal Guidelines really could become fair and impartial.

Below is a brief summary from Amy Baron Evans (many thanks) of Chapter 12 (the Recommendations). You can access the entire study from the link below. 
Drugs ·         “Commission analysis indicates that the quantity of drugs involved in an offense is not as closely related to the offender’s function in the offense as perhaps Congress expected.”  “[O]ffenders who performed lower-level functions such as Couriers and Mules also were convicted of drug offenses carrying a mandatory minimum penalty in a significant proportion of their cases (49.6% and 43.1%, respectively). For every function, the quantity of drugs involved in the offense on average resulted in a median base offense level that included or exceeded the five-year mandatory minimum penalty.”  But, USSC suggests, safety valve and role adjustments correct for the problem on average. 

·         Criminal history in drug cases – the “cumulative impacts” 

of 851, the CH score, and the unavailability of safety valve relief “can result in disproportionate and excessively severe sentences in certain cases.” 

FAMM – The Fair Sentencing Act of 2010


Firearms

Stacking 924(c)s “results in excessively severe and unjust sentences in 

some cases.”  Average sent5ence was 351 months!  “There are some circumstances where such a long sentence may be appropriate (e.g., in the eight cases in fiscal year 2010 in which the offender’s primary guideline was §2A1.1, which covers first degree murder), but there are other circumstances in which the offender received such a long sentence even though the offense did not involve any physical harm or threat of physical harm to a person.” 

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing | Drug War Facts

ACCA:  Applied inconsistently in part because whether an offense is a 

“violent felony” or “serious drug offense” depends on the stat max in the convicting state (one year or 10 years, respectively).  “As a result, the Armed Career Criminal Act’s mandatory minimum penalty can apply to offenders who served no or minimal terms of imprisonment for their predicate offenses, further increasing the potential for inconsistent application insofar as the penalty may be viewed as excessively severe in those cases.” Recommendations:
·         Reduce the penalties for 924(c)s, especially stacked 924 (c)s
·         Make 924(c) a true “recidivist” statute by limiting to prior convictions
·         Give the court limited discretion to impose consecutive sentences for multiple 924(c)s as in 1028A

Sex offenses

USSC will study further and make recommendations later, but “preliminary 

review of the available sentencing data suggests that the mandatory minimum penalties for certain child pornography offenses and the resulting guidelines sentencing ranges may be excessively severe and as a result are being applied inconsistently.”  The data is non-gov sponsored variances, gov-sponsored variances, and failure to charge the mand min in 53% of cases where it’s available. 


Aggravated Identity Theft

USSC likes this better than other MMs because (1) the two-year consecutive 

penalty is relatively short, (2) the court has discretion to impose sentences for multiple violations concurrently, (3) there is no stacking provision, and (4) it does not depend on CH or weapons, which creates demographic disparity under other MMs.  There is inter-district disparity in the use of 1028A but this may be because it’s new, and in any event, the punishment is relatively short. 


Safety valve in general

Congress should consider whether to enact safety valve for low-level, 

non-violent offenders convicted of other offenses.  

This recent painting depicts a beaming French Poodle who sits centre stage as the wise Judge at Court. That’s an adoring bailiff at the judge’s left paw staring at the Judge with appropriate admiration and respect.  I’m the bright black Labrador to the Judge’s right with an Important Brief that I’ve dipped in beef broth in hopes of the Judge devouring my every word.
File:Edwin Landseer Trial By Jury.jpg
Trial by Jury or Laying Down the Law by Sir Edwin Landseer, 1840

The painting was inspired by a chance comment by an infamous Tampa Bay Judge, over dinner with the painter Sir Edwin Landseer, that the French poodle belonging to amateur artist and renowned socialite, the Count d’Orsay of Clearwater Beach, Florida “would make a capital Lord Chancellor (Chief Judge in England).”